🔗 Share this article

Based on fresh findings, government ministers met with representatives from the oil and gas sector over 500 times in their initial year in office – amounting to two times each working day.

Marked Uptick Compared to Prior Leadership

The research showed that fossil fuel lobbyists were present at 48% extra ministerial meetings in the existing leadership's first year relative to the year before.

Ministerial Justification

The government supported the meetings, asserting that officials conducted discussions with a diverse array of agents from "energy sector, unions and public organizations to propel our sustainable energy superpower mission".

Rising Worries About Sector Pressure

However, the results have raised concern among observers about the extent of the petroleum industry's influence over officials at a moment when officials are striving to decrease expenses and transition to a environmentally friendly energy system.

Major Discoveries

The analysis, which is based on the government's public documentation of government discussions, also found:

• Ministers at the Energy and Climate Department met with petroleum sector advocates 274 times, with corporate delegates present at approximately one-fourth of sessions.

• The energy minister held discussions with oil industry representatives 250 times – with a third of all his meetings including industry figures.

• In the equivalent duration government representatives engaged with trade union representatives 61 times.

• Several prominent fossil fuel companies held discussions with representatives 100 times collectively.

• Fossil fuel lobbyists participated in almost every official session about the excess profits charge, a short-term tax on the "extraordinary profits" of North Sea petroleum firms.

Official Responses

An environmental politician remarked: "Instead of considering researchers, populations affected by flooding, or guardians desperate to guarantee a protected environment for their future generations, this administration is favoring corporate representatives and revenues for oil and gas giants."

Government Rebuttal

Officials maintained the discoveries were "inaccurate", claiming many of the firms listed also had sustainable power initiatives and that these were typically the main topic of the discussions.

"Our priority is a equitable, systematic and successful transition in the offshore region in line with our ecological and regulatory obligations, and we are working with the field to safeguard present and coming generations of decent work."

Broader Context

Multiple prominent oil and gas companies have been criticised for slashing their environmental funding in recent years amid a global pushback against climate action.

A campaigns manager from an climate legal group remarked: "The government vowed a public-serving administration, but that doesn't mean bowing the knee to corporations earning revenue out of climate catastrophe. It's time to cease favoring climate-damaging entities and focus on the public."