🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a prohibition on sending national guard in Portland, Oregon, after a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Case

The federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the president’s authority with an expanded group of 11 judges. The court also overturned a previous ruling from a three-judge panel that had supported the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the most recent development in a long-running legal battle over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to deploy state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in uncertainty since the end of September when the mobilization attempt was initiated in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that federal officials at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while local authorities assert that municipal police have command of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as a conflict zone, residents have been posting footage of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and planning events such as an protest bicycle event against the increased military presence.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in Portland enacted two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the deployment of any national guard troops in the state, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of state troops – but the second ruling stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under review together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This decision shows that facts are important and that the judicial system are working to hold this administration accountable. The founding document restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the president cannot dispatch the armed forces into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue defending state legislation, values, and sovereignty as this case progresses and our fight continues in the courts.”